Chandana Chakraborti1*, Nabanita Barua2, Sheuli Kumar3 and Rosy Chishti4
1Department of Ophthalmology,Assistant Professor,Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
2Department of Ophthalmology, RMO cum Clinical Tutor,Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
3Department of Ophthalmology,RMO cum Clinical Tutor,Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
4Department of Ophthalmology,PGT 1styear,Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India
Received: 29 October, 2014; Accepted: 21 March, 2015; Published: 23 March, 2015
Dr. Chandana Chakraborti , Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, Tel: 91-9830558243; 91-9830158243; Email:
Chakraborti C, Barua N, Kumar S, Chishti R (2015) A Rare Case of Benign Intracranial Hypertension with Bilateral Complete Visual Loss and Sixth Nerve Paresis. J Clin Res Ophthalmol 2(3): 033-035. DOI: 10.17352/2455-1414.000017
© 2015 Chakraborti C, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
BIH; Complete blindness; Surgical management
BIH: Benign Intracranial Hypertension; ICP: Increased Intracranial Pressure
Introduction: Benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) is a disorder defined by symptoms and signs suggestive of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in the absence of any cause evident on neuro-imaging or other evaluations. Usually the disease has a variable outcome but chances of severe visual loss are only 6%.
Methods: We report a case of 50 year old lady who presented to us with severe headache. Visual acuity was 20/20 both eyes. Anterior segment was within normal limit. Post segment evaluation revealed bilateral disc oedema. Thorough radiological and neurological examination confirmed diagnosis of Benign intracranial hypertension (BIH). We advised medical treatment and referred the patient to Neurology OPD for further management. She was lost to follow up to us for 4 months. She discontinued medicines in between. Her vision was 20/200 and fundus showed atrophic disc edema. We restarted previous medicines and referred to Neurology where she was admitted and managed conservatively. Finally she presented after 2 months with no perception of light both eyes. Examination revealed bilateral afferent pupillary defect and sixth nerve paresis. Fundus showed bilateral disc pallor.
Conclusion: Our endeavor is to document that BIH is not always benign condition. A multidisciplinary approach should be taken to look for early progression and appropriate intervention.
Benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) is a disorder defined by modified Dandy's criteria that include symptoms and signs suggestive of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) (e.g, headache, transient visual obscurations, pulsatile tinnitus, papilledema, vision loss),no episode of impaired consciousness, normal cerebrospinal fluid composition, no other cause evident on neuro-imaging or other evaluations .
The name distinguishes it from secondary intracranial hypertension produced by a malignancy, venous thrombosis , bony and vascular malformations . BIH in itself is not benign. Many patients suffer from incapacitating headache , nerve palsies  and severe visual loss6.We report a case of BIH where patient progressed to total blindness due to noncompliance to medical therapy.
A 50 years old female, recently diagnosed to have diabetes and hypertension, presented to our Ophthalmology OPD, in tertiary care hospital with the presenting complain of severe headache for1 month. Her height was5'3”, weight 80 kg. Her higher mental function and cranial nerve function were normal. All neurological examinations e.g. higher mental function, all cranial nerves from first to twelfth except second and sixth were normal. Locomotor system, sensory and motor examination of lower and upper limbs was normal. Visual acuity was 20/20 both eyes. Anterior segment was within normal limit. Post segment evaluation with slit-lamp biomicroscope revealed bilateral disc oedema.
Neuroimaging studies excluded all intracranial space occupying lesion. CT scan showed chinked lateral ventricles. Renal, hepatic function and thyroid profile were normal. Urine analyses, serum Calcium were normal. VDRL was negative. CSF pressure was 280mm Hg with normal cytology and proteins. Automated perimetry was done which was within normal limit.
On the basis of all above mentioned investigations patient was diagnosed to have BIH. We advised weight reduction, tab. Diamox 500mg 4 times a day, T. Prednisolone 60 mg for 2 week and referred in Neuromedicine OPD for further management. They confirmed the diagnosis and continued the same medication.
She was lost to follow up to us for four months. She came with gradually progressive loss of vision. The vision recorded was 20/200 with accurate projection of rays both eyes. Pupils were sluggishly reacting with fundus picture of atrophic papilledema (Figure 1). We explained the need of regular follow up and restarted the medicine. She was admitted in Neurology OPD and managed conservatively. Repeat radiological evaluation was done. MRI images (Figure 2) were suggestive of choroidal ischemic foci. MR arteriography and venography was within normal limit. We advised DFA which showed bilateral disc leakage even in early frames with normal foveal zone. She was advised a close follow up at 2 weekly intervals.
She came after two months. Her complaint loss of vision over last 1 week. Her vision was no perception of light in both eyes. Both pupils showed afferent pupillary defect. On examination of extraocular movement's abduction were restricted in both eyes (Figure 3a,3b). Fundus evaluation showed bilateral atrophic papilledema. Retrospectively we found patient took irregular treatment and neglected her symptoms. She took painkillers from local drug dispensing shop for her intermittent headache and used spectacles. At this stage we advised systemic control only and referred back to Neurology OPD.