Rafael de Lima Pedro1*, Gabriel Maia Krammer2, Luise Gomes da Motta3 and Marcelo de Castro Costa4
1PhD student of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontic Departament of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro- Brazil
2Graduated student of Federal Fluminense University- Brazil
3Adjunt Professor of Odontotécnica Departamento f Federal Fluminense University – Brazil
4Adjunt Professor of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontic Departament of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro – Brazil
Received: 22 December, 2015; Accepted: 04 January, 2016; Published: 08 January, 2016
Rafael Lima Pedro, Rua Sílvio Fontes, n. 100 bl. 1 ap. 207, Bangu, CEP: 21833-070, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, Tel: 055 021 34693551; E-mail:
de Lima Pedro R, Krammer GM, da Motta LG, de Castro Costa M (2016) Effect of Desensitizing Products on the Morphology of Dentin Substrate. J Dent Probl Solut 3(1): 002-005. 10.17352/2394-8418.000022
© 2016 de Lima Pedro R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Hypersensibility; Dental; Toothpaste; In vitro
The aim of this study was to determine the action of desensitizing materials on bovine dentin. Four extracted healthy bovine molars were selected out of which 5 blocks from cervical region of each tooth were obtained, resulting in a 5x5mm final area. To compose the negative control group (group B), the samples were separated and not submitted to any treatment. For the positive control (Group A) the blocks were treated with 37% phosphoric acid. For allow to use the same dentin samples for all groups ( 2 controls and 3 test group), the experiment group contained twelve dentin surface blocks divided in 5 groups (n=4 in each group), as manufacturers' recommendations, there were used: Dessensibilize KF 2% - 5% Potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride (C); Fluoride Gel - 2% sodium fluoride (D), Colgate Sensitive Pró-Alívio® Arginine 8% (E) and Calcium carbonate-based toothpaste (F). The samples were analyzed in Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and used the ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<005). The number and diameters of dentinal tubules were compared across the various groups. The samples from group E had a higher quantity of deposits on the peritubular and intertubular dentin with most closed tubules. Although, the groups A and B presented more opened dentinal tubules. However, only A has deposited a substratum from the reaction with desensitizing materials on the peritubular and intertubular dentin indicating same closed tubules. The analysis of the diameters of the tubules showed significant differences in groups B and C when compared to the other groups.
The carious and non-carious cervical lesions form a more complex group in dental practice, mainly referent to the identification of the etiologic agent and to the treatment to be given [1-3]. Normally, in many cases, they present high sensitivity, generating discomfort to the patient.
The etiology of them is, usually, of a multifactor nature, which makes it difficult to diagnose and ultimately treat the resulting dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) [4,5]. Due to these characteristics, DH is considered a chronic disorder that manifests itself though acute pain , not linked to an actual pathological process. Normally it results from chemical/osmotic and physical mechanical stimuli. However, the stimulus that is most commonly troubling is the ingestion of cold foods or even breathing through the mouth [2,6]. An important premise for the study of desensitizing therapies that derives from the hydrodynamics theory is that DH can be reduced by obliterating the exposed dentinal tubules [2,6].
Among the most used treatments for hypersensitivity we can highlight sodium fluoride , which forms a fluoride reservoir on the enamel surface (calcium fluoride), additionally, a small fraction of the fluorides applied on the dentin surface manages to be retained in the insoluble form of fluorapatite and act against sensitivity [3,4,6].
Another substance used is potassium nitrate, with a typically occlusive effect on the dentin [4,8], characterizing two different effects in reducing the dentin hyperesthesia, one immediate and one intermediate. Blockage of the tubules by crystals characterizes the intermediate effect, while the neuronal depolarization characterizes the immediate desensitizing effect of the potassium nitrate .
Research suggests that arginine, a natural amino acid found on the saliva, together with calcium carbonate, positively charged at physiological pH, are bound to the dentin surface, negatively charged, and help forming a calcium-rich layer on the dentin surface and within the dentinal tubules, sealing them. The arginine causes the occlusion of the dentinal tubules and, theoretically, such occlusion remains intact even after exposure to acids .
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test, in vitro, the action of several desensitizing materials in bovine dentin, verifying its effectiveness in obliterating the dentinal tubules.
Material and Methods
The study were laboratorial, in vitro one with convenience sample. The products used were select among the most used by dental sensitivity and the bovine dentin by human similarity.
Three products for professional use with a known desensitizing action have been tested.
Product 1: Dessensibilize KF 2% - 5% Potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride (FGM)
Product 2: Flutop Gel Neutro - 2% sodium fluoride (SSWhite)
Product 3: Colgate Sensitive Pró-Alívio® Arginine- (8%) and Calcium carbonate-based toothpaste (Colgate)
Sample preparation and experimentation
This study used three experimental group and two controls (positive and negative one). The objective were the dentin substrate of the same tooth had be used in all groups to avoid a sample bias, for example, regardless of the effectiveness of the product used or not. Thus each tooth serves as control of himself. So, four extracted healthy bovine molars were selected out of which 20 dentin blocks of the cervical region were obtained (one block to same tooth for each group), cut with carborundum disk, refrigerated and their size verified via Hu-Friedy® millimeter probe, resulting in a 5x5mm final area.
To facilitate the product action and after the scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation, the dental surface were polishing. The specimens were kept in distilled water throughout the research period and, to facilitate handling, were fixed with photopolymerizable resin in plastic bases with a 3cm diameter. The standardized smear was prepared on all specimens using 400-type sandpaper for 1 minute followed by 60014-type sandpaper for the same amount of time and stored separately for 1 week in distilled water until performance of the applications.
To assess the dentin tubules of each group and if them could interfere the final results, two groups were add, a negative control, were no laboratorial experimentation were used and a positive control group were it was used a product to allow the greatest amount of open tubules without use of any other product for close them. To compose the negative control group (group A), four specimens were separated and not submitted to any type of treatment. For the positive control (Group B), after the smear, four blocks were treated with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds and then washed for the same amount of time for full removal of the smear layer.
The experiment group contained twelve dentin surface blocks divided in 3 groups (n=4) on which different substances were applied. The bull medicine of companies that produce the products were followed for use of all products tested.
On group C (n=4) a gel solution based on Potassium nitrate 5% and sodium fluoride 2% was used. The brand used was Desensibilize KF 2% (FGM). The desensitizing gel was evenly applied on the blocks with the aid of a new and free from infection paintbrush, then, after the minimum 10-minute period had passed, the gel was removed from the specimens with cotton and abundant distillation water.
On group D (n=4) a gel based on sodium fluoride 2% (Flutop Gel Neutro Cristal – SSWhite) was applied. The fluoridated gel was applied on the specimens and removed with the aid of cotton and abundant distillation water after a 4-minute period.
On group E (n=4) a paste based on Arginine 8% and calcium carbonate (Sensitive Pró-Alívio® toothpaste – Colgate) was used. The paste was applied with the aid of a Robson brush on low rotation for 10 seconds and then, the excess was removed with a cotton ball and abundant distillation water.
The specimens were submitted to oven drying at 37ºC for 12 hours, mounted on stubs, vacuum metallized with gold ions on a DESK II Deton Vacuum device for 10 minutes, and analyzed on a SEM JEOL JFM no. 5610 L.V., at the IMA laboratory, at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
The photomicrographs were obtained through SEM with a 1000x to 6000x increase, totaling 120 photomicrographs. The qualitative analysis of the dentinal tubules was made by a second evaluator in order to prevent any knowledge bias. The features on the intertubular and peritubular dentinal surface and the condition of the dentinal tubes were considered, and the quantity and characteristics of the tubules found in the assessed area were analyzed and multiplied by the total area of the sample, reaching an approximate figure of the total number of dentinal tubules present in that sample.
For the quantitative analysis, the statistics program SPSS® 16.0 was used through Variance Analysis (ANOVA) tests and Tukey post-test for multiple comparisons, with a 5% significance. The number and diameters of dentinal tubules were compared across the various groups. The results were analyzed by the team with help of a statistician when necessary.
The analysis of the number of dentinal tubules presented the following results: Group A = 32,060±10,360/mm2, Group B = 40,710±8,255/mm2; Group C = 39,490±7,375/mm2; Group D = 31,877±9,527/mm2 and Group E = 30,297±10,008/mm2. The differences were considered significant (p<0.01) when groups B and C were compared to the others (Chart 1A). The analysis of the diameters of the tubules (Group A = 1.39±0.48μm; Group B = 2.34±0.57μm; Group C = 2.28±0.51μm; Group D = 1.44±0.44μm and Group E = 1.42±0.45μm) showed significant differences (p<0.01) between groups B and C when compared to the other groups (Chart 1B).