Elif Yalcin*, Suna Kose and Mufit Akyuz
Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
Received: 04 November, 2014; Accepted: 17 March, 2015; Published: 19 March, 2015
Elif Yalcin, Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, Tel: 0 505 3749467; Email:
Yalcin E, Kose S, Akyuz M (2015) Comparing the Distances of Different Intramuscular Gluteal Injection Sites to the Sciatic Nerve. J Nov Physiother Phys Rehabil 2(1): 014-015. DOI: 10.17352/2455-5487.000019
© 2015 Yalcin E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Gluteal injections; Ultrasound; Siatic nerve injury
Introduction: Sciatic nerve injury is a well-known complication of intra-muscular gluteal muscle injections. Affected individuals usually present with foot drop and this results in varying degrees of motor disability. There are different sites such as ventrogluteal, dorsogluteal that can be used for gluteal injections. In last years, the ventrogluteal site is accepted as a more safe and suitable injection site than dorsogluteal site. This study was carried out to compare the distance to the siatic nerve under the piriformis muscle of these different gluteal injection sites. The study also aimed to evaluate the muscle thicknesses at these injection sites.
Materials and Methods: Twenty five participants with BMI<22 were recruited from outpatient clinic that were prescribed intramuscular treatment. Firstly, by an experienced nurse the dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection points have been marked. By using a linear array probe (7–12 MHz Logiq P5a) the distances of both the dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal sites to the siatic nerve just under the piriformis muscle have been measured. Later on the muscle thickness at these sites were measured.
Result: The mean distances between the dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection points to the siatic nerve under the piriformis muscle are consecutively 9±2.3cm and 18±3.5 cm. No statistical difference has been found between the muscle thickness of the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal injections sites (p<0.01).
Conclusion: According to the distance to sciatic nerve, the ventrogluteal injection site seems a more advisable and safe injection point.
It is known that for gluteal injections the upper outer quadrant is the safest area. The two most commonly referenced intramuscular injection sites are the dorsogluteal, ventrogluteal sides in the gluteal region for adults. Historically the dorsogluteal injection side is the main side for injection. This site been used by nurses for years as the target of choice for intramuscular injections. There is a wide agreement in the literature that the ventrogluteal site is much more preferable . The goal of this paper is to identify the more safety place for gluteal injections according to the distance of these two injection sites to the sciatic nerve at the gluteal region and the muscle thicknesses at these injection sites.
Materials and Methods
There were 25 participants who were prescribed intramuscular treatment with a body mass index <22, recruited from outpatient clinic between January-March 2014. The goal to select the patients with BMI lower than 22, was that those people with lower body mass indexes have a higher risk for siatic injury during injections. The patients with gluteal trauma, burn or surgical intervention were excluded. After informed consents were obtained, the routine injection side in the dorsogluteal region was determined and marked by an experienced nurse. Then the sciatic nerve has been evaluated using a linear array probe (7–12 MHz Logiq P5a) at the entrance point under the piriformis muscle. The distance between these two points has been measured and recorded. The muscle thickness (gluteus maximus) at this injection side also measured ultra sonographically.
At the second step of our study, a more safe and advisable injection side has been determined at the ventrogluteal region (gluteus medius and minimus muscle) under the iliac crest. The distances of this second injection point to the siatic nerve under the piriformis muscle have also been measured. Also for standardization the distance of this advised point to the spinal iliaca anterior superior have also been measured. The muscle thicknesses at this point have also been measured ultrasonographically.
The results were evaluated by SPSS statistical software programme. Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences. Eleven of the patients were woman, and 14 of them were men. The mean age of the participant was 37±13 and the mean BMI were 18± 2.5 kg. The mean distance between the dorsogluteal injection points to the siatic nerve under the piriformis muscle is 9±2.3 cm. The mean muscle thickness at this point was 22±5.6 cm. The mean distance of the second more advisable and safe injection point at ventrogluteal side to the siatic nerve was 18±3.5 cm. The mean muscle thickness at this point is 24±6.5 mm. The distance of this point to the spina iliaca anterior superior obliquely is 9.5±2.2 cm. There was a significant difference between the distance to the sciatic nerve of dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection sites while no significant differences were found between the muscle thickness of the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal injections sites.
- Small SP (2004) Preventing sciatic nerve injury from intramuscular injections: literatureReview. J AdvNurs 47:287–296.
- Akyuz M, Turhan N (2006) Post injection sciatic neuropathy in adult. ClinNeurophysiol 117:1630-1635.
- Ramtahal J, Ramlakhan S, Singh K (2006) Sciatic Nerve Injury Following Intramuscular Injection: A Case Report and Review of the literature. J NeurosciNurs 38:238-240.
- Zelman S (1961) Notes on techniques of intramuscular injection. The avoidance of needless pain and morbidity.Am J Med Sc 241: 563-574.