ISSN: 2641-2977
Arch Hepat Res
Review Article       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Current Trends of Combination Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Management in China

En-Qiang Chen*

Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
*Corresponding author: En-Qiang Chen, Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, Tel: 862885422650; Fax: 862885423052; E-mail: chenenqiang1983@hotmail.com
Received: 05 August, 2015 | Accepted: 27 August, 2015 | Published: 28 August, 2015
Keywords: Chronic hepatitis B; Antiviral therapy; Combination therapy

Cite this as

Chen EQ (2015) Current Trends of Combination Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Management in China. Arch Hepat Res 1(1): 001-004. DOI: 10.17352/ahr.000001

In the past decade, five oral nucleos(t)ide analogs and two formulations of pegylated interferon alpha have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Due to low personal income and inadequate health care system, low-to-moderate genetic barrier antiviral drugs are still widely used in China, which brings increased suboptimal response, viral relapse and resistance in real-life clinical practice. Combination therapy is a relative good approach to deal with these dilemma in Chinese CHB patients, and the strategies include de novo combination, rescue combination therapy, and optimized combination therapy. At present, combination therapy could be sonsidered for those who have suboptimal response to antiviral drugs, at high risk of complications in the event of virological breakthrough/rebound, or already with drug-resistant hepatitis B virus infection.

Introduction

Despite the availability of hepatitis B immunization, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major public health problem in China, with an estimated 7.18% rate in the general population [1]. It is well-known that persistent elevation of serum HBV DNA levels are associated with increased risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development [2,3], and complete suppression of HBV DNA replication is the most effective way to improve the outcomes of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) [4,5].

In the past decade, five oral nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs) and two formulations of pegylated interferon alpha (PegIFNα) have been approved for CHB treatment [6], and high potent entecavir (ETV), tenofovir (TDF) as well as PegIFNα are recommended as first-choice drugs by many international guidelines [7]. Though those agents rarely eradicate HBV infection, they can maximally suppress viral replication and reduce the risk of disease progression and complications. However, due to low personal income and inadequate health care system, low-to-moderate genetic barrier antiviral drugs such as lamivudine(LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) and telbivudine(LdT) are still widely used in China, which brings an alarming of the increasing rates of suboptimal response [8-10], viral relapse and resistance in real-life clinical practice [11,12]. How to deal with these dilemma has become the primary concern for CHB treatment.

Discussion

In China, the low-to-moderate genetic barrier antiviral agents are still recommended by Chinese Society of Hepatology and Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases [13]. Currently, approximately 50% of CHB patients are being or previously treated with these agents in China, and majority of them are treated with LAM and ADV (including generic drugs). It is worth to mention that this situation is different from that in Europe and the United States and some other developed countries.

It has been reported that the drug resistance would develop in 70% of patients after 5 years with LAM therapy, 29% of patients after 5 years with ADV therapy, and 32% of patients after 3 years of LdT therapy [14]. Therefore, the present situation of antiviral therapy in China is not optimistic. Except for the relatively cheap price, we think the outdated hepatitis B guideline knowledge of the physicians, especially those in the grassroots medical institutions, also should play extremely important roles in the widespread use of these low genetic barrier antiviral agents.

Evidences have suggested that the emergence of HBV resistance would easily diminish the biochemical and virological benefits from previous antiviral therapy. And the resistance could also limit the future therapeutic options for individual patient, because of the possible cross-resistance between different NAs. Recently, suboptimal virological response has gained more and more attentions [15]. According to the published literatures, suboptimal virological response could be found in 68% of HBeAg-positive and 29% of HBeAg-negative patients with LAM, and in 55% of HBeAg-positive and 20% of HBeAg-negative patients with LdT [16,17]; and this rate would be more higher in ADV-treated patients. Because of the unsatisfactory inhibition of HBV replication, the problem of suboptimal response also common in PegIFNα-treated patients, especially in patients with genotypes C and D [18,19]. It has been revealed that the prognosis of patients with long-term suboptimal response is also disappointing, and those patients would be more easily to develop drug resistance and viral relapse, which is correlate with increased risk of HCC development.

Recently, the combination strategies for rescuing and optimizing CHB patients who experienced failure or unsatisfactory antiviral therapy has been proposed and widely concerned [20,21]. As compared to sequential NAs monotherapy, combination therapy has significant advantages in inhibiting viral replication and reducing the risk of multi-drug resistance [22-25]. At present, combination therapy has been recommended for the following cohorts in China: patients with virological breakthrough or rebound regardless of the evidence of drug resistance; patients with suboptimal virological response or no response to prior NAs or PegIFNα treatment; patients who cann’t afford to develop drug resistance from a clinical perspective (for example, patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or with HBV recurrence after liver transplantation[26]); and patients with the high risk of resistance development during NAs treatment.

Theoretically, the ideal combination therapy should target distinct steps of the HBV life cycle, thus the combinationn of PegIFNα and NAs seems to be the most appealing approach, because they have different mechanisms of antiviral action [27]. However, due to the alternative drug is very limited, current strategies of combination therapy also includes two different NAs combination in real clinical practice. According to the difference in startup time, combination therapy could be divided into three categories, which includes de novo combination, rescue combination therapy, and optimized combination therapy.

At present, de novo combination of NAs are not routinely recommended as first-line treatment for ordinary CHB patients[14], because high potent ETV and TDF monotherapy could achieve an ideal inhibition of HBV DNA replication. However, if ETV or TDF is not available, the de novo combinationof less potent agents could be considered, as it would bring benefits to those who has high viremia levels and pre-existing viral resistance strains to NAs. In addition, this de novo combination therapy also could be considered for those who have decompensated cirrhosis and/or with HBV recurrence after liver transplantation, because the uncontrolled HBV replication may easily lead to rapid deterioration of liver functions. Recently, the de novo combination of NAs and PegIFNα is also reported, and the combination of ADV and PegIFNα has attracted the most attention. Except for a higher HBV DNA undetectable rate [28], the de novo combination of ADV and PegIFNα also could lead to a strong HBsAg reduction and intrahepatic cccDNA decline [29]. However, there seems to be no significantly improvement of the curative efficacy of PegIFNα and LAM as compared to that of PegIFNα monotherapy [30]. Sufficient evidences have suggested that rescue combination therapy should be performed in patients with virological breakthrough or rebound. Indeed, clinical and virological studies have demonstrated the benefit of an early treatment adaptation, as soon as viral load increases [31,32]. As compared to sequential monotherapy, rescue combination therapy could achieve a durable HBV DNA inhibition and rare multidrug resistance [32-40]. One famous 3-year follow up study of 145 LAM-resistant patients under prolonged ADV+LAM combination showed that 80% of LAM-resistant patients cleared serum HBV DNA and 100% remained free of virologic and clinical breakthroughs; and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year cumulative rates of de novo rtA181T were only 1%, 2%, 4%, and 4%, respectively [38]. As compared to switch-to ETV monotherapy, the combination of LAM+ADV suppresses HBV replication more effectively and results in a significantly lower genotypic resistance [33,41]. Considering that the rtA181T mutant HBV displays a reduction in susceptibility to LAM [42], add-on LAM is not appropriate for ADV-resistant patients with this mutation. Instead, add-on of LdT or ETV should be considered, if unable to get TDF.

Optimized combination therapy is an optimization strategy based on the Roadmap concept, which is supposed to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with suboptimal antiviral response [43]. Optimized combination therapy shoud be lanuched at 24 or 48 weeks after initial antiviral therapy. For patients with suboptimal response to LAM or LdT at week 24, the optimized combination therapy of ADV or TDF add-on may be considered; while for patients with suboptimal response to ADV, ETV or TDF at week 48, the optimized combination therapy of a second drug add-on without cross-resistances may be considered. It is worth to mention that different combination strategy would result in different responses. For patients with suboptimal response to ADV, though both LAM and LdT add-on combination therapies could decrease the HBV DNA level remarkably, LdT add-on treatment could induce a significantly higher HBeAg seroconversion than LAM add-on treatment [44].

With the support of the Chinese government, Chinese scholars have made great progress in optimized combination therapy. A recent study reported by Prof. Hou JL and his research team evaluated the efficacy at week 104 of LAM monotherapy, LAM plus ADV combination therapy, and LAM optimization strategy in HBeAg positive CHB patients. Their findings showed that the combination of LAM and ADV exhibited effective viral suppression and relatively low resistance; and in LAM-treated patients with suboptimal virological response at week 24, promptly adding on ADV is necessary to prevent resistance development [45]. Additionally, a multicenter open-label randomized controlled study was also performed to evaluate the efficacy of ADV add-on combination therapy in 204 HBeAg-positive suboptimal responders of LdT monotherapy, and the results suggested that ADV add-on combination therapy could induce an additive antiviral potency, with 71.1% achieving virological response at week 104 and only 0.5% developing genotypic resistance, compared with 46.6% who achieved virological response and 37.8% who developed genotypic resistance with LdT monotherapy [46].

Conclusion

Due to low personal income and inadequate health care system, low-to-moderate genetic barrier antiviral drugs are still widely used in China, which brings increased suboptimal response, viral relapse and resistance in real-life clinical practice. Combination therapy is a relative good approach to deal with these dilemma in Chinese CHB patients, and the strategies include de novo combination, rescue combination therapy, and optimized combination therapy. At present, combination therapy could be sonsidered for those who are suboptimal response to low-to-moderate genetic barrier antiviral drugs, at high risk of complications in the event of virological breakthrough/rebound, or already with drug-resistant HBV. However, there is no uniform combination protocol at present, and how to make reasonable combination of existing antiviral drugs, and help patients obtain more benefits from combination therapy is worth studying for us in future.

This work was supported by grants from Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Prevention and Control Tian Qing Liver Disease Research Fund (cfhpc20132047 and TQGP20140011).

  1. Cui Y, Jia J (2013) Update on epidemiology of hepatitis B and C in China. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28: 7-10.
  2. Mendy ME, Welzel T, Lesi OA, Hainaut P, Hall AJ, et al. (2010) Hepatitis B viral load and risk for liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in The Gambia, West Africa. J Viral Hepat 17: 115-122.
  3. Chan HL, Wong VW, Wong GL, Chim AM, Lai LH, et al. (2009) Evaluation of impact of serial hepatitis B virus DNA levels on development of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Microbiol 47: 1830-1836.
  4. Zhou JY, Zhang L, Li L, Gu GY, Zhou YH, et al. (2012) High Hepatitis B virus load is associated with hepatocellular carcinomas development in Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients: a case control study. Virol J 9: 16.
  5. Yuen MF, Seto WK, Chow DH, Tsui K, Wong DK, et al. (2007) Long-term lamivudine therapy reduces the risk of long-term complications of chronic hepatitis B infection even in patients without advanced disease. Antivir Ther 12: 1295-1303.
  6. Ko SY, Choe WH, Kwon SY, Kim JH, Seo JW, et al. (2012) Long-term impact of entecavir monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B patients with a partial virologic response to entecavir therapy. Scand J Gastroenterol 47: 1362-1367.
  7. Uribe LA, O'Brien CG, Wong RJ, Gish RR, Tsai N, et al. (2014) Current treatment guidelines for chronic hepatitis B and their applications. J Clin Gastroenterol 48: 773-783.
  8. Lampertico P (2009) Partial virological response to nucleos(t)ide analogues in naive patients with chronic hepatitis B: From guidelines to field practice. J Hepatol 50: 644-647.
  9. Carrouee-Durantel S, Durantel D, Werle-Lapostolle B, Pichoud C, Naesens L, et al. (2008) Suboptimal response to adefovir dipivoxil therapy for chronic hepatitis B in nucleoside-naive patients is not due to pre-existing drug-resistant mutants. Antivir Ther 13: 381-388.
  10. Gallego A, Sheldon J, Garcia-Samaniego J, Margall N, Romero M, et al. (2008) Evaluation of initial virological response to adefovir and development of adefovir-resistant mutations in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat 15: 392-398.
  11. Zoulim F, Locarnini S (2009) Hepatitis B virus resistance to nucleos(t)ide analogues. Gastroenterology 137: 1593-1608.
  12. Locarnini S [2010] Transmission of antiviral drug resistant hepatitis B virus: implications for public health and patient management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25: 649-651.
  13. Chinese Society of Hepatology and Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association (2011) [The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B (2010 version)]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 19: 13-24.
  14. European Association for the Study of the Liver (2012) EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 57: 167-185.
  15. Yegin EG, Ozdogan OC (2014) Partial virological response to three different nucleotide analogues in naive patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13: 602-611.
  16. Lai CL, Gane E, Liaw YF, Hsu CW, Thongsawat S, et al. (2007 Telbivudine versus lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 357: 2576-2588.
  17. Liaw YF, Gane E, Leung N, Zeuzem S, Wang Y, et al. (2009) 2-Year GLOBE trial results: telbivudine Is superior to lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 136: 486-495.
  18. Rijckborst V, Sonneveld MJ, Janssen HL (2011) Review article: chronic hepatitis B - anti-viral or immunomodulatory therapy? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33: 501-513.
  19. Chen CH, Lee CM, Hung CH, Wang JH, Hu TH, et al. (2011) Hepatitis B virus genotype B results in better immediate, late and sustained responses to peginterferon-alfa in hepatitis-B-e-antigen-positive patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26: 461-468.
  20. Wang LC, Chen EQ, Cao J, Liu L, Wang JR, et al. (2010) Combination of Lamivudine and adefovir therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with poor response to adefovir monotherapy. J Viral Hepat 17: 178-184.
  21. Tang H, McLachlan A (2001) Transcriptional regulation of hepatitis B virus by nuclear hormone receptors is a critical determinant of viral tropism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 1841-1846.
  22. Wang F, Wang H, Shen H, Meng C, Weng X, et al. (2009) Evolution of hepatitis B virus polymerase mutations in a patient with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus treated with sequential monotherapy and add-on nucleoside/nucleotide analogues. Clin Ther 31: 360-366.
  23. Wei C, Chong YT, Wen JZ, Li YW, Li G (2011) Characterization of hepatitis virus B isolated from a multi-drug refractory patient. Virus Res 155: 254-258.
  24. Kurashige N, Ohkawa K, Hiramatsu N, Oze T, Yakushijin T, et al. (2009) Two types of drug-resistant hepatitis B viral strains emerging alternately and their susceptibility to combination therapy with entecavir and adefovir. Antivir Ther 14: 873-877.
  25. Locarnini S (2008) Primary resistance, multidrug resistance, and cross-resistance pathways in HBV as a consequence of treatment failure. Hepatol Int 2: 147-151.
  26. Sohn W, Paik YH, Cho JY, Ahn JM, Choi GS, et al. (2014) Influence of hepatitis B virus reactivation on the recurrence of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection in patients with low viral load. J Viral Hepat 22: 539-550.
  27. Zoulim F (2004) Mechanism of viral persistence and resistance to nucleoside and nucleotide analogs in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Antiviral Res 64: 1-15.
  28. Piccolo P, Lenci I, Demelia L, Bandiera F, Piras MR, et al. (2009) A randomized controlled trial of pegylated interferon-alpha2a plus adefovir dipivoxil for hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Antivir Ther 14: 1165-1174.
  29. Wursthorn K, Lutgehetmann M, Dandri M, Volz T, Buggisch P, et al. (2006) Peginterferon alpha-2b plus adefovir induce strong cccDNA decline and HBsAg reduction in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 44: 675-684.
  30. Marcellin P, Lau GK, Bonino F, Farci P, Hadziyannis S, et al. (2004) Peginterferon alfa-2a alone, lamivudine alone, and the two in combination in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 351: 1206-1217.
  31. Papatheodoridis GV, Dimou E, Dimakopoulos K, Manolakopoulos S, Rapti I, et al.  (2005)Outcome of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B on long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy starting with lamivudine. Hepatology 42: 121-129.
  32. Lampertico P, Vigano M, Manenti E, Iavarone M, Lunghi G, et al. (2005) Adefovir rapidly suppresses hepatitis B in HBeAg-negative patients developing genotypic resistance to lamivudine. Hepatology 42: 1414-1419.
  33. Zhao LS, Qin S, Zhou TY, Tang H, Liu L, et al. (2000) DNA-based vaccination induces humoral and cellular immune responses against hepatitis B virus surface antigen in mice without activation of C-myc. World J Gastroenterol  6: 239-243.
  34. Tang H, Banks KE, Anderson AL, McLachlan A (2001) Hepatitis B virus transcription and replication. Drug News Perspect 14: 325-334.
  35. Gaia S, Barbon V, Smedile A, Olivero A, Carenzi S, et al. (2008) Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B: an observational study on adefovir in monotherapy or in combination with lamivudine. J Hepatol 48: 540-547.
  36. Rapti I, Dimou E, Mitsoula P, Hadziyannis SJ (2007) Adding-on versus switching-to adefovir therapy in lamivudine-resistant HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology  45: 307-313.
  37. Yatsuji H, Suzuki F, Sezaki H, Akuta N, Suzuki Y, et al. (2008) Low risk of adefovir resistance in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients treated with adefovir plus lamivudine combination therapy: two-year follow-up. J Hepatol 48: 923-931.
  38. Lampertico P, Vigano M, Manenti E, Iavarone M, Sablon E, et al. (2007) Low resistance to adefovir combined with lamivudine: a 3-year study of 145 lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B patients. Gastroenterology 133: 1445-1451.
  39. Peters MG, Hann Hw H, Martin P, Heathcote EJ, Buggisch P, et al. (2004) Adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 126: 91-101.
  40. Lin Y, Nomura T, Yamashita T, Dorjsuren D, Tang H, et al. (1997) The transactivation and p53-interacting functions of hepatitis B virus X protein are mutually interfering but distinct. Cancer Res 57: 5137-5142.
  41. Raney AK, Kline EF, Tang H, McLachlan A (2001) Transcription and replication of a natural hepatitis B virus nucleocapsid promoter variant is regulated in vivo by peroxisome proliferators. Virology 289: 239-251.
  42. Inoue J, Ueno Y, Wakui Y, Niitsuma H, Fukushima K, et al. (2011) Four-year study of lamivudine and adefovir combination therapy in lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B patients: influence of hepatitis B virus genotype and resistance mutation pattern. J Viral Hepat 18: 206-215.
  43. Gane EJ (2008) The Roadmap concept: using early on-treatment virologic responses to optimize long-term outcomes for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatol Int 2: 304-307.
  44. Chen EQ, Zhou TY, Bai L, Wang JR, Yan LB, et al. (2012) Lamivudine plus adefovir or telbivudine plus adefovir for chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal response to adefovir. Antivir Ther 17: 973-979.
  45. Liang X, Cheng J, Sun Y, Chen X, Li T, et al. (2015) A Randomized, Three-arm Study to Optimize Lamivudine Efficacy in HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30: 748-755.
  46. Sun J, Xie Q, Tan D, Ning Q, Niu J, et al. (2014) The 104-week efficacy and safety of telbivudine-based optimization strategy in chronic hepatitis B patients: a randomized, controlled study. Hepatology 59: 1283-1292.
© 2015 Chen EQ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.