Disclosure of cancer diagnosis to the patient: A cross-sectional assessment of public point-of-view in Saudi Arabia

Cancer is still the most diffi cult diagnosis that the physicians encountered and found themselves facing the issue of announcement and disclosure of a diagnosis for both families and patients. Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the attitudes of the public people toward the disclosure of cancer diagnosis to patients in Saudi Arabia. Material and methods: This study was cross-sectional study. The data were collected randomly using simple random sampling method from 510 participants from general population; one tool was used based on the previous studies. It contains two parts; the fi rst was the sociodemographic data of the participants and questions related to cancer information and attitude toward disclosure of cancer diagnosis. Results: Majority of participants preferred to inform the patients with a rational to help in treatment, also signifi cant correlations were found between the demographic characteristics and various responses of the cancer information. Conclusion: Majority of participants prefer to inform the patients about cancer diagnosis to help in treatment and prepare their life. Research Article Disclosure of cancer diagnosis to the patient: A cross-sectional assessment of public point-ofview in Saudi Arabia Essmat A Mansour1*, Isabelita N Pandaan1, Essmat M Gemeay2, Ayat H Al-Zayd3 and Eman K Alenize4 1Medical Surgical Nursing Department. King Saud University, College of Nursing, Saudi Arabia 2Psychiatric Nursing Department, Tanta University, College of Nursing, Egypt 3RN King Fahd Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 4RN AL Yammamha Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Dates: Received: 30 March, 2017; Accepted: 19 May, 2017; Published: 24 May, 2017 *Corresponding author: Essmat A Mansour, Medical Surgical Nursing Department, King Saud University, College of Nursing, Saudi Arabia, Tel: 0966533995996; E-mail:


Introduction
Cancer is a stressful and complex term composed of sixletters that commonly arouse vision of disability, despair and death. It is a pervasive cluster of diseases touching the lives of many individuals and families. It can occur in persons of all ages, sexes and all socioeconomic groups, culture and geographic areas. In addition, cancer is the most feared of all disease known to man, regardless of one's intellectual, educational background, or social standard. No other diagnosis is capable of producing the terror-stricken response that cancer evokes. It is the most common death leading disease worldwide, accounting for about 8.8 million deaths in 2015 [1].
Cancer still the most confusing disease till now, beside its tragic meaning and nature to all people, It is still the most diffi cult diagnosis that the physicians encountered and found themselves facing the issue of announcement and disclosure of a diagnosis for both families and patients [2].
The disclosure of cancer diagnosis and prognosis has an important but still unresolved issue in cancer management and care in Middle East and other parts of the world. No one can deny that cancer treatment is a complicated expensive, and time -consuming process which necessitates full cooperation between patients, families, physicians, nurses and other health care professionals [3]. In spite of that, families requests for non -disclosure of diagnosis and prognosis to the patient which put the physician in the most contradicting, at the same time the most diffi cult situation of clear contradiction between what they have learned as the respectable ethics of medicine and what they have and what the public attitude dictates [4].
Many people believe that telling truth about the nature and prognosis of the cancer can result in anxiety and hopelessness in the patients and it will negatively affect the treatment processes and make it more complicated and diffi cult [5]. Despite of this rational many researches [5,6], and evidence found that lack of information can increase uncertainty, anxiety and dissatisfaction, and good communication has been reported to be associated with better emotional adjustment and higher levels of satisfactions with symptoms management.
There are many researches, concerned with this issue [4][5][6], which support the right of the patient to disclosure even public point-of-view in Saudi Arabia. Arch Nurs Pract Care 3(1): 038-044. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17352/anpc.000023 with frightening disease like cancer but with the advanced technology in both diagnosis and treatment, there is also scary increasing in cancer prevalence among people, which may affect or change the attitudes of people toward this issue.
In a multi-nationalities country like Saudi Arabia where there are many Non-Saudi who live and work there in many sectors as health care settings like physicians and nurses So, there is a cross cultural differences in many issues one of them is the cancer disclosure to the patients as a basic element of ethics in medicine which is patient's autonomy, the western countries usually accept the concept of disclosure but in eastern countries whether to tell truth to the patient or not represent a dilemma for the health care professional. There are many factors that could affect the principles of autonomy in Saudi country since the relatives of cancer patients want to protect the patients from harmful and bad news and demean the right of patients to know the truth.
During the daily clinic practice, physicians occasionally fi nd themselves confronted with situation of clear contradiction between what they have to do in relation to ethics of medicine and what the public attitudes dictates. In most of this situation the family request for non-disclosure of both diagnosis and prognosis to the patient. So to deal with such attitude physicians and all health care team need to deeply understand the sociocultural back ground. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the point of views of public people toward the disclosure of cancer diagnosis to patients in Saudi Arabia.

Aim of the Study
The aim of this study is to assess the point of views of the public people toward the disclosure of cancer diagnosis to patients in Saudi Arabia.

Methodology
This study was designed as cross-sectional study. The data were collected randomly using simple random sampling method from 510 participants from general population aged 20 years and above, According to world metric information the median age of Saudi population in year 2016 -2017 was 28.6 year [7] and also from both sexes. There was no restriction or exclusion criteria which prevent participant from the involvement in the study except if he had a previous experience with cancer in his social life because there was a possibility that his responses would be affected by his experiences. Willingness to participate in the study was an inevitable.
One tool was used in this study; it was developed by the researchers based on the previous studies and literatures [8][9][10]. It consisted of two parts, the fi rst was the sociodemographic data of the participants as: age, sex, nationality, occupation, residency & education. The second consisted of nine multiple choices questions related to cancer information and the sources of this information question 1-3 and the attitude of the participants toward cancer disclosure to the patients and the rational for their choices in question 4-9 those questions which formed the used questionnaire were selected because it was more relevant to the research aim.
The questionnaire was concise and contain limited numbers of questions (only 9 questions) to encourage people to participate specially data was collected in a public places and the too long questionnaire usually discourage the participants to participate.
The validity of the questionnaire was tested by having the questionnaire reviewed by a panel of 3 expert in nursing who are holding a PhD in nursing to test the tool for its clarity, organization and relevance.
Pilot study was carried out on 10 participants to test the clarity and relevance of the tool. According to the results of pilot study, necessary modifi cations in the questionnaire were done and these 10 participants were not added to the actual sample size.
The researcher mailed 305 questionnaires in November 2016 and received 205 with a response rate of 67.2%, and collect 305 questionnaires through direct, individualized interviews with public population in different public places like hypermarkets, Malls, healthy clubs, universities in Riyadh, data collection started November 2016 until January 2017.
Consent was taken from the participant either written or verbal. The purpose of the study was explained to each participant before starting the interview to gain his confi dence, cooperation and to alleviate any doubts. The pertinent research and ethical committees and all the legal guardians of the participants approved the study protocol. Either verbally or written permission was obtained from every one before participating in the study. No hazards were present. Participants were assured of confi dentiality. Data were only available to the researchers and all participants were informed that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any time.

Data analysis
All responses gathered from the questionnaire were entered utilizing the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software program. Demographic characteristics were presented in frequencies and percentages (%). Chi-square test was applied for categorical data, while for continuous data, the Pearson-R was applied. One way Anova was applied for both categorical and continuous data determining signifi cant differences. Table 1 refl ects the demographic characteristics of the studied sample consisting of varied profi le from a total of 510 invited participants. From among the respondents, a majority (59.6%) are aged 20-29. More than half (57.8%) are females. Almost all (83.7%) are of Saudi nationality. Nearly half (40.8%) from among the participants are students. Most of the respondents (74.3%) have a higher educational level. A larger number (89.2%) resides in the rural area.

Cancer information
The responses of the participants regarding various questions on cancer information are shown in table 2. A majority (86.5%) affi rmed to have information about cancer. Greatly (58.6%) from media sources. Furthermore, nearly one hundred percent of the participants believe that it is possible to recover from cancer (93.3%). A signifi cant number (82.5%) prefers that the patient is told about the disease. Refl ecting that nearly half (37.8%) believes this will help in the course of treatment. Whereas, a lesser number (16.9%) of the participants have a negative response on disclosure. Only a total of 83 from 510 (16.3%) of the respondents reasoned disclosure is not preferred because knowing the truth has a negative effect. More than half (51.6%) expressed that fear is the hardest. Moreover, almost all (82.2%) confi rmed that indeed faith plays a role in accepting the disease. The most common reaction when hearing the truth about cancer is fear, representing 405 (79.4%) responses from 510 participants. In addition, it is revealed that support of friends and family, relation between physician and family, relation between patient and nursing staff, faith, quality of treatment and knowing that the patient will be cured is important and helpful in accepting cancer as a disease ( 32.4%). Nearly 100 % of the responses revealed that it is necessary to give patients information about their illness and the results of tests and treatment (87.8%). Almost all (90.6%) expressed that it is easier to deal with the patients if they know about the disease.

Correlation analysis between demographic characteristics and respondents choices
As shown in table 3, using both statistical treatment, the correlation matrix refl ects the signifi cant relationship between the demographic characteristics and the responses the participants selected. Disparity is seen in the chosen responses among the majority of the respondents when compared to their  However, responses differed when compared with sex characteristics. Statements on the possibility of recovering from cancer (p=.159), opinion on what is the hardest for a cancer patient (p= 121) and religious faith playing a role in accepting the disease (p=.136) are signifi cantly related to the sex characteristics of the respondents. Moreover, demographic predictor specifi c to nationality of the participants revealed a signifi cant relationship on the responses pertaining to rationale on negative preference to tell the patient he has cancer (p=.541) and the opinion on the most common reaction of the patient when hearing the truth (p=.114).
Meanwhile, employment status presents a correlation on the affi rmation that information from cancer are sourced from the media (p=.106 ) and that it is easier to deal with patients who know about their disease (p=.135) In addition, there was a signifi cant relationship between the educational level and the chosen responses on what is the hardest for a cancer patient (p=.156) and religious faith playing a role in accepting the disease (p=.226) Furthermore, the place of residency of the participants shows that correlation that is signifi cant in reference to their choices are on the possibility of recovering from cancer (p=.155), what is the common reaction of the patient when hearing the truth (p=-098) and that it is necessary to give patients information about their illness and the results of tests and treatment (p=.149). Table 4 refl ects the differences between responses according to the demographic characteristics of the studied sample. These results were taken using one way Anova. There are distinct differences in some of the responses between groups according to their demographic profi le.

Differences between responses according to their profi le
In the age characteristics, signifi cant differences are found. The younger adults ( 20-29 years old) prefers to tell the patient about cancer (f= 6.578, p=.002),affi rms that fear is hardest for cancer disease (f=4.957,p=.007), that indeed faith plays a role (f =4.746, p=.000) and that support of friends and family, relations between physician and family, relations between patient and nursing staff, faith, quality of treatment, knowing that the patient will be cured are factors that are important and helpful to accept the disease (f = 8.900, p=.009) as compared to their older counterparts.  in contrast to the respondents residing in the urban area.

Discussion
A diagnosis of cancer often imposes a crisis with the person having to confront the illness and treatment because he has to deal with the issues regarding uncertainty over future, unmet goal of life and death [11]. In the past, it was believed that, the patient shouldn't informed about his cancer diagnosis [12].
But nowadays, there are many health professionals prefer to inform their patients about their cancer [13] in fact the issue of disclosure about bad and sad information to the patient has been addressed for a long time in the most aspects of studied literature communication [14], and many guidelines for the processes of disclosing processes has been established in the western countries [15]

Conclusion
Disclosure of cancer diagnosis to the patients is preferred from the perspective and point of view of Saudi population participate in the current study, in order to help in the course of treatment.