HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of natural polyphenols

A simple and reliable high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLCDAD) method was developed for simultaneous determination of 9 natural substances common in plants: three major catechins ((-) epicatechin gallate, (-) catechin, (-) epigallocatechin), four major fl avonoids (rutin, quercetin, myricetin, kaempferol), gallic and vanillic acid. The optimized method was carried out for 40 minutes with detection wavelengths of 278 and 368 nm, gradient elution system on a C18 reversedphase column. The developed system was evaluated for several validation characteristics, as system suitability, specifi city, linearity, limit of detections (LODs) and limit of quantifi cations (LOQs). The newly established HPLC method was proved to be specifi c, sensitive, linear and precise. The received results showed good chromatographic separation and assumed that the described method was validated. The HPLC-DAD method can be a useful tool for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the selected polyphenol compounds and can be improved in the future for the examination of the polyphenols of interests in individual herbal infusions. Research Article HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of natural polyphenols Vanya Dimcheva1*, Nikolay Kaloyanov1, Maria Karsheva1, Milena Funeva-Peycheva2 and Nadezhda Stoilova2 1Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 8 Kl. Ohridski bul.,1756 Sofi a, Bulgaria 2Central Laboratory of Veterinary Control & Ecology (CLVCE), Bulgarian Food Safety Agency (BFSA), 5 “Iskarsko house”str., 1528 Sofi a, Bulgaria Received: 11 July, 2019 Accepted: 07 August, 2019 Published: 08 August, 2019 *Corresponding author: Vanya Dimcheva, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 8 Kl. Ohridski bul.,1756 Sofi a, Bulgaria, E-mail:


Introduction
The interest in the phenolic compounds, in particular fl avonoids, have increased last years. This is due to their antioxidant and bioactive properties associated with human health benefi ts. Hydroxybenzoic acids are phenolic compounds with a general structure C6-C1. The related acids such as gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, syringic acid, and vanillic acid are major compounds in the plants and foods [1]. Due to their structural diversity, phenolic acids have antipyretic, analgesic and anti-microbial activities [1,2].
The major objective of the current study was to develop a simple, sensitive and accurate reversed-phase HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous separation of nine natural substances common in plants -(-) -epicatechin gallate, (-) -catechin, (-) -epigallocatechin, rutin, quercetin, myricetin, kaempferol, gallic and vanillic acid. The used reference standards were chosen because they are reported to be widely represented in the plant world and have a strong antioxidant capacity ( Figure 1).
The identifi cation of phenolic acids and fl avonoids in plant extracts was of major interest in determining their properties and their antioxidant or antibacterial properties [7]. Increasing knowledge of the health effects of polyphenols in food has led to the need to develop new techniques for separating bioactive molecules. There is an increasing demand for a highly sensitive and selective analytical method not only for extraction but for the analysis of polyphenols [8]. A very common method used for the qualitative and quantitative determination of polyphenols is HPLC coupled with DAD. The HPLC is a powerful technique for analysis of natural substances such as polyphenols, their identifi cation, and evaluation [2].
Literature survey reveals that a number of analytical J Anal Bioanal Chem 3(1): 039-043. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17352/ojabc.000009 methods have been developed for the determination of natural polyphenols. Typically, the chromatographic conditions of these HPLC methods include the use of a C18 reverse phase column, a diode matrix detector [6].
Generally, in the reversed-phase HPLC polyphenol analyses for the separation of desired bioactive components are used two mobile phases. However, the mobile phase's selection depends on the type and nature of the polyphenol compounds to be separated by HPLC [9].
Usually, the mobile phase A content water with small concentrations of acetic acid, formic acid and trifl uoroacetic acid (TFA) and the mobile phase B content 100 vol. % organic solvents. The organic solvents such as methanol or acetonitrile are necessary to reduce the peak tailing and giving sharper peaks [10].
Regardless, the large number of studies the simultaneous determination of polyphenolics of different groups raiment diffi cult [4,11]. In the literature, various HPLC procedures in the separation of different classes of polyphenolic compounds are investigated for quantifi cation and identifi cation of fl avonoids and phenolic acids [12][13][14], catechins [15], phenolic acids [16], polyphenols, fl avonoids, and phenolic acids [14].

Method validation
When performing the validation of the analytical method were evaluated fallowing validation parameters -system suitability, specifi city, linearity, limit of detections and limit of quantifi cations in compliance with the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines Q2 R1 [17].
System suitability: To be sure that the HPLC system and As acceptance criteria for achieving the system suitability of the HPLC system were considered the number of theoretical plates more than 3000, tailing factor less than 2.0, the resolution between peaks more than 2.0 and % RSD of analyte peaks areas of six replicate injections, less than 2 %. Relative standard deviation (RSD) of the area of six replicate injections of analytes were observed as a measure of precision. For this purpose, the working standard solution (50 μg mL -1 ) was injected into the HPLC system and analyzed with the described method and chromatogram was recorded. The resolution between peaks was accepted to be not more than 2.0.

Specifi city:
The specifi city of the chromatographic method is to be avoided the appearance of other components other than those desired to appear on the chromatogram and to lead to an ambiguous assessment of the analytes [17]. To check the specifi city was performed the peak purity tests. All the chromatograms were recorded. Calibration curves were obtained for each of the studied compounds. The calibration graphs were constructed by plotting the peak area of the studied analytes against respective concentrations. The correlation coeffi cients (R 2 ), slopes and the intercepts were calculated. The acceptance criterion for correlation coeffi cients was assumed to be more than 0.99.

Limit of detection and limit of quantifi cation: LODs and
LOQs were determined for each of the studied compounds.
Their values were calculated using the expressions 3.3/s and 10/s, respectively, in which  is intercepted standard deviation and s is the slope of calibration curve [18].

Results and Discussion
To be optimized the proposed method during the development process a various composition of mobile phases were tried until the necessary separation was achieved.
Different concentrations of TCA in water were tried for mobile phase A and for mobile phase B acetonitrile and methanol were tested. After several runs, 0.1 % of TCA in water for mobile phase A and 100 % acetonitrile for mobile phase B were found to be optimal. Diode-array detection was set to collect data in the range of 200 ÷ 400 nm. The wavelength of 278 nm was found as optimal for determination of the three catechins and two polyphenol acids and wavelength of 368 nm was found as optimal for quantifi cation of the fl avonoids -rutin, myricetin, quercetin, and kaempferol. The optimum wavelengths were corresponding to the optimum area of the peaks studied.
The method optimization has an object a good separation between the peaks but also in the short run time. The analytical conditions were optimized mainly and based on the results from several experiments each reference standard was wellseparated with the fl ow rate of 1.6 μg mL −1 , stationary phase type Hiber RT 125-4; RP18 and gradient eluting program of 40 minutes. The injection volume and a column oven temperature were also optimized. The chromatographic conditions were optimized on the basis of system suitability parameters such as retention time, a number of theoretical plates, tailing factor, resolution, and precision. Good separation was achieved with peaks identifi ed as the 9 individual polyphenol compounds separately. The resolution between individual peaks was more than 2.0. The tailing factors for each individual peak were less than 2.0. The column performance was demonstrated by the number of the theoretical plates for each individual analyte and was recorded to be more than 3000. The precise of the HPLC system was indicated with the RSD of the peak areas of six replicate injections of each reference substance which was less than 2.0.
The system suitability parameters were tested by injecting standard solutions at the beginning of the HPLC method optimization and were recorded from the chromatograms. They were monitored during all performed analyses and have indicated that the developed HPLC system was suitable After the analytical condition's optimization, the HPLC method was evaluated for several validation characteristics such as specifi city, linearity, LOD, and LOQ.
The specifi city was demonstrated with the peak's purity of studied analytes. No interferences were observed close to retention times of reference standards of interest, so it was confi rmed that each analyte' peak was attributable to a single compound. So, it can be concluded that the in-house reported HPLC method showed good specifi city.
The HPLC chromatograms of the separated polyphenol substances are given in Figure 2.
The linearity of the established HPLC method was  ( max ) for the tested reference standards are shown in Table 1.
The regression analyses showed good linearity for all analytes. For individual analytes, R 2 was achieved to be > 0.99. This suggests that the proposed method is linear.
The sensitivity of the developed HPLC method could be proved by the LOD and LOQ values calculated by the regression equations. It becomes clear that the method is more sensitive for the fl avonoids, polyphenol acids and (-) -epicatechin considered by the low values of the LOD values ranged from 0.015 -1.023 μg mL -1 and the LOQ values ranged from 0.028 -1.023, respectively. The (-) -catechin and (-) -epigallocatechin shows highest LOD (2.82; 7.34) and LOQ concentrations (8.54; 22.26) than other polyphenols. This means no universal method can be used with all phenolic compounds: different approaches must be used depending on the different plant extract and polyphenols of interest.
There are different methods reported in the literature for the simultaneous estimation of different classes of polyphenols like the method presented by A. Alonso Garcia et al., [19], for determination of quercetin; gallic acid, (+) -catechin, (-)epicatechin, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, salicylic acid and gentisic acid and the method presented by E. Altiok et al., [20], for assessment of hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, rutin, luteolin-7glucoside, verbascoside, apigenin-7-glucoside, oleuropein, luteolin, caffeic acid, vanillic acid and catechin. The reported in the literature methods could not be directly compared