ISSN: 2581-3870
Archives of Clinical Nephrology
Review Article       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Renal congestion related to worsening renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: Diuretic strategy for acute cardiorenal syndrome

Michiya Ohno*, Yuki Misao, and Hiroshige Ohashi

Division of Nephrology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
*Corresponding author: Michiya Ohno, Division of Nephrology, Asahi University Hospital, 3-23 Hashimoto-cho, Gifu City, Gifu 500-8523, Japan, Tel: +81-58-253-8001; Fax: +81-58-253-7039, Email: mohno@murakami.asahi-u.ac.jp; mongj624@outlook.jp
Published: 27 August, 2018 | Accepted: 09 September, 2018 | Received: 11 September, 2018
Keywords: Acute decompensated heart failure; Diuretics; Worsening renal function; Decongestion; Cardiorenal syndrome; Word count: 4,793

Cite this as

Ohno M, Misao Y, Ohashi H (2018) Renal congestion related to worsening renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: Diuretic strategy for acute cardiorenal syndrome. Arch Clin Nephrol 4(1): 012-017. DOI: 10.17352/acn.000031

Deterioration of renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) influences the prognosis, suggesting that ADHF should be managed as an acute cardiorenal syndrome. Close collaboration between cardiologists and nephrologists is frequently crucial for management of this condition. It is noteworthy that renal congestion promotes worsening renal function (WRF). High-dose loop diuretics can cause WRF, but are often necessary for treatment of congestion, which is the main symptom of ADHF. However, it is controversial whether WRF associated with diuretic therapy actually has a poor prognosis. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of renal congestion related to WRF in patients with ADHF and on the current status of WRF. We also review the use of loop diuretics to treat ADHF and chronic heart failure, as well as the current role of selective vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist therapy.

Introduction

Heart failure is clinically a syndrome characterized by symptoms (e.g., dyspnea, exertional intolerance, and fatigue) and signs (e.g., pedal edema, pulmonary crackles, and elevated jugular venous pressure) caused by decreased cardiac output that are attributable to cardiac disorder [1,2]. Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) can be defined as the new onset or the recurrence of symptoms and signs of heart failure, requiring urgent evaluation and treatment [1-4]. The recurrence of ADHF causes cardiac injury and chronic heart failure (CHF) which lead to asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction, and then to worsening symptoms, absolutely requiring management and treatment of heart failure [1-4].

ADHF is the most frequent cause of hospitalization in the United States and Europe [1, 2]. It is associated with high in-hospital and post-discharge mortality rates and a high readmission rate. Symptoms due to congestion are predominant in patients with ADHF and only 10-20% of these patients have symptoms related to low cardiac output [3-5]. It has been suggested that the treatment strategy for ADHF should involve management of this condition as acute cardiorenal syndrome. Recently, there has been concern about worsening renal function (WRF) because of renal congestion in ADHF rather than prerenal acute kidney injury (AKI) due to low cardiac output. Persisting signs of congestion and renal dysfunction have been consistently reported to be among the most important prognostic variables for ADHF [2, 6–12]. WRF is usually defined as an increase of serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL compared with the admission value. WRF occurs in approximately one third of patients admitted with ADHF and is associated with a longer hospital stay, a higher readmission rate, and worse short-term and long-term survival [10, 12-18]. Renal congestion participates in the development of WRF [19], and patients with heart failure who remain on long-term treatment with high-dose loop diuretics have a poor prognosis [20-22]. The objective of administering loop diuretics differs between ADHF and CHF, with diuretics being used to achieve decongestion in ADHF versus use for management of the fluid balance in CHF.

In this review, we focus on the mechanism of renal congestion related to WRF in ADHF and on current understanding of WRF. We also review the use of loop diuretics for ADHF and CHF, and the potential of treatment with a selective vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist that does not activate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system.

Mechanism of renal congestion related to WRF in patients with ADHF

In patients with heart failure, elevation of the inferior vena cava pressure due to fluid retention causes an increase of renal venous pressure, resulting in congestion of the kidney. Because the kidney is an encapsulated organ, renal congestion leads to elevation of the interstitial pressure with compression of the renal vasa recta and tubules, leading to reduction of renal medullary blood flow and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), followed by development of renal ischemia and reduced Na+ diuresis. In patients with heart failure and kidney disease, renal damage can be readily exacerbated, leading to marked fluid retention. Conversely, fluid retention associated with ADHF causes renal congestion, which is a factor in promoting renal damage (Figure 1). Thus, a vicious circle can develop in ADHF where renal congestion is complicated by renal ischemia that results in a further decline of renal function [23-26].

Is WRF actually problematic?

Worsening renal function (WRF) during treatment of ADHF is frequently defined as an absolute increase of serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dl, and several studies have shown that it is an important adverse prognostic factor [27]. Elevation of central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with renal impairment and is independently related to all-cause mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease [27]. An increase of renal venous pressure leads to a decline of GFR, which is probably mediated by decreased renal perfusion. On the other hand, it has been reported that larger early net fluid loss is associated with a lower risk of WRF, but not with greater reduction of right atrial pressure (RAP), suggesting that RAP is not a reliable indicator of the extent of decongestion and the risk of WRF [28], although changes of the fluid balance generally influence both CVP and RAP. Interestingly, a change of GFR by ≥20% in either direction (better or worse renal function) during treatment of ADHF has been reported to identify a patient population with advanced disease and a poor prognosis [29]. At present, it is controversial whether WRF is necessarily associated with a worse prognosis in patients with heart failure because publication bias was suggested by funnel plot assessment in a meta-analysis [30]. Thus, we cannot discriminate between WRF with or without adverse prognostic consequences. However, funnel plot analysis showed no evidence of publication bias for the relation between baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mortality in the same report, indicating that baseline CKD is a prognostic factor for patients with heart failure [30]. Elevation of serum creatinine may be strongly influenced by deterioration of renal hemodynamics caused by heart failure-related changes and diuretic therapy in patients who have baseline CKD, and may be a marker of more severe heart failure rather than actual WRF [31].

A conclusion has not been reached about the prognostic influence of WRF in relation to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), when patients who have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are compared to those having heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (cut-off LVEF of 50%) [32, 33]. In patients with ADHF, occurrence of WRF is more closely related to age, diuretic dosage, and underlying diseases (including CKD, diabetes, and hypertension) than to LVEF [30]. However, the influence on WRF of diuretics and RAA system inhibition by angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) is reported to be related to LVEF [34, 35].

Diuretics are employed to promote excretion of excess body fluid with salt when treating ADHF, although diuretic therapy activates factors promoting fluid retention, such as the RAA system, catecholamines, and vasopressin, eventually leading to progression of renal dysfunction with exacerbation of fluid retention. Long-term use of high-dose loop diuretics by patients with heart failure is associated with a poor prognosis [20-22, 36, 37], providing the negative impression that loop diuretics may dose-dependently promote WRF [38].

However, it was recently reported that effective decongestion by loop diuretics resulted in a better prognosis for ADHF patients, even if WRF showed exacerbation [39, 40], and the benefits of effective decongestion are assumed to overcome the disadvantages of WRF [23-26]. In patients with ADHF, venous congestion is the most important hemodynamic factor driving WRF, and it depends on elevation of CVP rather than a decrease of cardiac output [23]. Thus, decongestion may be favorable for maintenance of renal function. Interestingly, when patients with or without WRF were compared, there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, the mortality rate, or the readmission rate [41].

Effect of Na+ diuretics (loop diuretics) on ADHF

High-dose loop diuretics are preferentially used to achieve decongestion in patients with acute cardiorenal syndrome. On the other hand, such treatment is associated with WRF and the development of AKI. The cause of WRF was traditionally regarded as a decrease of the effective circulating blood volume due to reduction of cardiac output by heart failure and volume depletion by high-dose diuretic therapy [19]. However, renal congestion derived from blood pooling in the inferior vena cava and renal veins has also been shown to be an important hemodynamic mechanism of WRF [23-26]. CKD is a common condition [42, 43] and is related to the pathophysiology of worsening ADHF, with the combination of CKD and ADHF resulting in resistance to diuretic therapy (including high-dose diuretics) and a decline of renal function. It is known that the effect of diuretic therapy can be attenuated during treatment due to the “diuretic breaking phenomenon” and diuretic resistance [44, 45]. Na+ retention occurs due to activation of the RAA system after short-acting loop diuretics promote fluid excretion (diuretic breaking phenomenon). In addition, long-term administration of loop diuretics promotes Na+ retention in the distal tubules and collecting ducts located downstream of the ascending limb of the loop of Henle, while hypokalemia related to long-term administration reduces Na+ secretion into the renal tubules, and delivery of loop diuretics to the renal tubules is impaired because drug absorption is affected by intestinal tract edema and renal blood flow is decreased secondary to reduction of the effective circulating blood volume (diuretic resistance). In ADHF patients, both diuretic resistance and the diuretic dose are factors with an independent influence on the prognosis [22].

It has been reported that the loop diuretic dose, presence of WRF, and persistent pulmonary congestion at discharge influence the prognosis of ADHF [21, 40, 46, 47]. Therefore, it seems important to achieve early decongestion in ADHF patients before aiming at prognostic improvement for CHF, although we currently lack evidence that loop diuretics improve the long-term prognosis.

Diuretic strategy for maintaining renal function in patients with CHF

In the management of CHF, it is important to maintain renal function without causing exacerbation of heart failure because deterioration of renal function is an adverse prognostic factor for CHF patients [48-50]. It is necessary to inhibit activation of the RAA system, as well as managing the fluid balance to prevent volume overload [i.e., excessive preload on the heart]. The RAA system has an important role in regulating renal hemodynamics [51]. A decrease of cardiac output due to heart failure leads to reduced renal blood flow, but GFR is maintained by contraction of the efferent arterioles in response to angiotensin II [52-54]. Inhibition of the RAA system by treatment with ARBs or ACEIs results in dilation of the efferent arterioles and promotes the maintenance of long-term renal function regardless of an early decline in GFR [55-57] that occurs due to the decrease of intraglomerular pressure derived from the effect of reduced afterload on intraglomerular hemodynamics. Reducing the daily dosage of loop diuretics or the number of doses by using long-acting agents is important for minimizing RAA system activity, and combined administration with ARBs or ACEIs is recommended.

Effect of a water diuretic (selective vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist) that does not activate the RAA system on ADHF

Tolvaptan is a selective vasopressin-2 receptor antagonist that does not activate the RAA system [58] and maintains renal hemodynamics [59], suggesting that it may be useful for renal protection. Tolvaptan can be expected to promote renal decongestion by decreasing the inferior vena cava pressure via reduction of fluid overload, in addition to maintaining renal medullary blood flow, which has a renoprotective effect due to prevention of renal medullary ischemia and inhibition of RAA system activation.

There have been increasing reports about tolvaptan, and evaluation of its usefulness for decongestion in ADHF was decided in 2017 [60, 61]. The EVEREST (Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study with Tolvaptan, tolvaptan dose of 30mg/day) trial in 2007 and the AQUAMARINE (Answering the Question of Tolvaptan’s Efficacy for Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Renal Failure, tolvaptan dose of 15mg/day) study in 2016 investigated tolvaptan in patients with HFrEF and revealed early improvement of congestion symptoms. However, two clinical trials reported in 2017, the TACTICS-HF (Targeting Acute Congestion with Tolvaptan in Congestive Heart Failure, tolvaptan dose of 30 mg/day) trial and the SECRET of CHF (Study to Evaluate Challenging Responses to Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure, tolvaptan dose of 30mg/day) trial, did not show improvement of congestion symptoms despite increased fluid excretion [60-63]. The prevalence of WRF among patients receiving tolvaptan was comparable to that among those receiving control therapy, except in the TACTICS-HF trial. These findings did not support the use of tolvaptan for early decongestion in ADHF based on cost and limited efficacy, thereby ending a debate that has been ongoing for approximately 10 years since the EVEREST trial was reported in the United States [64]. The open-label AQUAMARINE study in Japan included subjects with a higher LVEF relative to the double-blind trials of patients with HFrEF [63]. Thus, investigation of tolvaptan in patients with HFpEF may be considered.

There is currently no evidence as to whether adding tolvaptan to a loop diuretic for fluid management in CHF contributes to maintenance of renal function in patients with chronic cardiorenal syndrome. Further investigation may be justified from the viewpoint of reducing afterload on the kidney and renal protection, because treatment that has a diuretic effect without reducing renal blood flow is theoretically desirable.

Conclusion

In ADHF patients, WRF is associated with renal congestion. Treatment of ADHF aimed at decongestion should be the top priority before considering the long-term prognosis. When the prognostic significance of WRF is assessed, including its influence on the hospital stay, medical costs, in-hospital or post-discharge mortality, and short-term or long-term readmission rates, studies that stratify patients by their background characteristics are necessary because the influence of WRF may vary according to factors such as the age and underlying diseases.

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Yamada Translation Bureau, Inc. for reviewing the English manuscript.

  1. Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, Feldman AM, Francis GS, et al. (2009) focused update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation 119: 1977-2016. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y75g72y5
  2. Dickstein K, Cohen-Solal A, Filippatos G, McMurray JJ, Ponikowski P, et al (2008) ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur J Heart Fail 10: 933-989. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yam587nw
  3. Gheorghiade M, De Luca L, Fonarow GC, Filippatos G, Metra M, et al, [2005] Francis GS. Pathophysiologic targets in the early phase of acute heart failure syndromes. Am J Cardiol 96: 11G-17G. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y84mpunr
  4. Metra M, Teerlink JR (2017) Heart failure. Lancet 390: 1981-1995. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y86oslf5
  5. Fonarow GC, Stough WG, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Gheorghiade M, et al. (2007) Greenberg BH, O'Connor CM, Sun JL, Yancy CW, Young JB; OPTIMIZE-HF Investigators and Hospitals. Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved systolic function hospitalized for heart failure: a report from the OPTIMIZE-HF Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 768-777. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y8n37b2l
  6. Gheorghiade M, Pang PS (2008) Acute heart failure syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 557-573. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ydx4odrq
  7. McClellan WM, Flanders WD, Langston RD, Jurkovitz C, Presley R (2002) Anemia and renal insufficiency are independent risk factors for death among patients with congestive heart failure admitted to community hospitals: a population-based study. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1928-1936. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yax92vnw
  8. Nohria A, Hasselblad V, Stebbins A, Pauly DF, Fonarow GC, et al (2008) Shah M, Yancy CW, Califf RM, Stevenson LW, Hill JA. Cardiorenal interactions: insights from the ESCAPE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1268-7124. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y9nqw269
  9. Heywood JT, Fonarow GC, Costanzo MR, Mathur VS, Wigneswaran JR (2007) ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. High prevalence of renal dysfunction and its impact on outcome in 118,465 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure: a report from the ADHERE database. J Card Fail 13: 422-430. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y9h7f7pr
  10. Klein L, Massie BM, Leimberger JD, O'Connor CM, Piña IL, et al. (2008) OPTIME-CHF Investigators. Admission or changes in renal function during hospitalization for worsening heart failure predict postdischarge survival: results from the Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure (OPTIME-CHF). Circ Heart Fail 1: 25-33. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yb5zjzr9
  11. Harjola VP, Follath F, Nieminen MS, Brutsaert D, Dickstein K, et al. (2010) Drexler H, Hochadel M, Komajda M, Lopez-Sendon JL, Ponikowski P, Tavazzi L. Characteristics, outcomes, and predictors of mortality at 3 months and 1 year in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 12: 239-248. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ychbd7tz
  12. Butler J, Chirovsky D, Phatak H, McNeill A, Cody R (2010) Renal function, health outcomes, and resource utilization in acute heart failure: a systematic review. Circ Heart Fail 3: 726-745. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ydgvtluv
  13. Butler J, Forman DE, Abraham WT, Gottlieb SS, Loh E, et al. (2004) Relationship between heart failure treatment and development of worsening renal function among hospitalized patients. Am Heart J 147: 331-338. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yb328blj
  14. Cowie MR, Komajda M, Murray-Thomas T, Underwood J, Ticho B (2006) POSH Investigators. Prevalence and impact of worsening renal function in patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure: results of the prospective outcomes study in heart failure (POSH). Eur Heart J 27: 1216-1222. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yda8kr9k
  15. Damman K, Navis G, Voors AA, Asselbergs FW, Smilde TD, et al. (2007) Worsening renal function and prognosis in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Fail 13: 599-608. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yaa38dgf
  16. Forman DE, Butler J, Wang Y, Abraham WT, O'Connor CM, et al. (2004) Incidence, predictors at admission, and impact of worsening renal function among patients hospitalized with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 431: 61-67. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ycdaz778
  17. Metra M, Nodari S, Parrinello G, Bordonali T, Bugatti S, et al. (2008) Worsening renal function in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure: clinical implications and prognostic significance. Eur J Heart Fail 10: 188-195. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y7hetffa
  18. Breidthardt T, Socrates T, Noveanu M, Klima T, Heinisch C, et al. (2001) Effect and clinical prediction of worsening renal function in acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 107: 730-735. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y93cepby
  19. Ljungman S, Laragh JH, Cody RJ (1990) Role of the kidney in congestive heart failure. Relationship of cardiac index to kidney function. Drugs 39: 10-21. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ybgemzbf
  20. Hasselblad V, Gattis Stough W, Shah MR, Lokhnygina Y, O'Connor CM, et al. (2007) Relation between dose of loop diuretics and outcomes in a heart failure population: results of the ESCAPE trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 9:1064-1069. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yamjoxt3
  21. Peacock WF, Costanzo MR, De Marco T, Lopatin M, Wynne J, et al. (2009) ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Impact of intravenous loop diuretics on outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure: insights from the ADHERE registry. Cardiology. 113:12-19. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ybw4wedy
  22. Rastegar A, Soleimani M, Krishnan N, Ramani K (2017) Diuretic use in congestive heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome. NephSAP 2017 16: 13-18.
  23. Mullens W, Abrahams Z, Francis GS, Sokos G, Taylor DO, et al. (2009) Importance of venous congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 589-596. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yaewba4q
  24. Dupont M, Mullens W, Tang WH (2011) Impact of systemic venous congestion in heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep 8: 233-241. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y8xgtvmy
  25. Ross EA (2012) Congestive renal failure: the pathophysiology and treatment of renal venous hypertension. J Card Fail 18: 930-938. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y7cwkfqr
  26. F Gnanaraj J, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Raj DS, Radhakrishnan J (2013) The relevance of congestion in the cardio-renal syndrome. Kidney Int. 83:384-391. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ya76nba8
  27. Damman K, van Deursen VM, Navis G, Voors AA, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. (2009) Hillege HL. Increased central venous pressure is associated with impaired renal function and mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease. Am Coll Cardiol 53: 582-588. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y9o6zd5w
  28. Aronson D, Abassi Z, Allon E, Burger AJ (2013) Fluid loss, venous congestion, and worsening renal function in acute decompensated heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 15: 637-643. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ydxydhwv
  29. Testani JM, McCauley BD, Kimmel SE, Shannon RP (2010) Characteristics of patients with improvement or worsening in renal function during treatment of acute decompensated heart failure. Am J Cardiol 106: 1763-1769. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yc6kjsk2
  30. Damman K, Valente MA, Voors AA, O'Connor CM, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. (2014) Hillege HL. Renal impairment, worsening renal function, and outcome in patients with heart failure: an updated meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 35: 455-469. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y9cozo3h
  31. Ruggenenti P, Remuzzi G (2011) Worsening kidney function in decompensated heart failure: treat the heart, don't mind the kidney. Eur Heart J 32: 2476-2478. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yanjwd64
  32. McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Tarantini L, Squire I, Komajda M, et al. (2012) Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) Investigators. Renal dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction: impact of the new Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration Group formula. Circ Heart Fail 5: 309-314. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yakg6eds
  33. De Vecchis R, Ciccarelli A, Ariano C, Cioppa C, Giasi A, et al. (2011) Pucciarelli A, Cantatrione S. In chronic heart failure with marked fluid retention, the i.v. high doses of loop diuretic are a predictor of aggravated renal dysfunction, especially in the set of heart failure with normal or only mildly impaired left ventricular systolic function. Minerva Cardioangiol 59: 543-554. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yd7gec94
  34. Testani JM, Kimmel SE, Dries DL, Coca SG (2011) Prognostic importance of early worsening renal function after initiation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Circ Heart Fail 4: 685-691. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yakr85do
  35. Damman K, Perez AC, Anand IS, Komajda M, McKelvie RS, et al. (2014) Worsening renal function and outcome in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and the impact of angiotensin receptor blocker treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 64: 1106-1113. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ya8nycwl
  36. Eshaghian S, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC (2006) Relation of loop diuretic dose to mortality in advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol 97: 1759-1164. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ycqwmuhw
  37. Testani JM, Brisco MA, Turner JM, Spatz ES, Bellumkonda L, Parikh CR, et al. (2014) Tang WH. Loop diuretic efficiency: a metric of diuretic responsiveness with prognostic importance in acute decompensated heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 7: 261-270. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y85esdcr
  38. Maeder MT, Rickli H, Pfisterer ME, Muzzarelli S, Ammann P, et al. (2012) Fehr T, Hack D, Weilenmann D, Dieterle T, Kiencke S, Estlinbaum W, Brunner-La Rocca HP; TIME-CHF Investigators. Incidence, clinical predictors, and prognostic impact of worsening renal function in elderly patients with chronic heart failure on intensive medical therapy. Am Heart J 163: 407-414. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y8maxfnt
  39. Testani JM, Chen J, McCauley BD, Kimmel SE, Shannon RP (2010) Potential effects of aggressive decongestion during the treatment of decompensated heart failure on renal function and survival. Circulation 122: 265-272. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yas9jupz
  40. Metra M, Davison B, Bettari L, Sun H, Edwards C, et al. (2012) Lazzarini V, Piovanelli B, Carubelli V, Bugatti S, Lombardi C, Cotter G, Dei Cas L. Is worsening renal function an ominous prognostic sign in patients with acute heart failure? The role of congestion and its interaction with renal function. Circ Heart Fail 5: 54-62. Link: 'https://tinyurl.com/ydaq9uro
  41. Verdiani V, Lastrucci V, Nozzoli C (2010) Worsening renal function in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure: risk factors and prognostic significances. Int J Nephrol 2011: 785974. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ycalzhl8
  42. Imai E, Horio M, Watanabe T, Iseki K, Yamagata K, et al. (2009) Hara S, Ura N, Kiyohara Y, Moriyama T, Ando Y, Fujimoto S, Konta T, Yokoyama H, Makino H, Hishida A, Matsuo S. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the Japanese general population. Clin Exp Nephrol 13: 621-630. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ybnlryuq
  43. Foley RN, Collins AJ (2013) The USRDS: what you need to know about what it can and can't tell us about ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 845-51. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y9wjyvno
  44. Hoorn EJ, et al. (2016) Chapter 51 Diuretics. Brenner&Rector’s The Kidney 10 th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier 1702-1736.
  45. Hoorn EJ, Ellison DH (2017) Diuretic Resistance. Am J Kidney Dis 69: 136-142. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y7zrgdwq
  46. Smith GL, Vaccarino V, Kosiborod M, Lichtman JH, Cheng S, et al. (2003) Worsening renal function: what is a clinically meaningful change in creatinine during hospitalization with heart failure? J Card Fail 9: 13-25. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ya56h2ob
  47. de Silva R, Nikitin NP, Witte KK, Rigby AS, Goode K, et al. (2006) Incidence of renal dysfunction over 6 months in patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction: contributing factors and relationship to prognosis. Eur Heart J 27: 569-581. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yc267vuj
  48. Hillege HL, Girbes AR, de Kam PJ, Boomsma F, de Zeeuw D, et al. (2000) Renal function, neurohormonal activation, and survival in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 102: 203-210. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y8ns589q
  49. Hillege HL, Nitsch D, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, McMurray JJ, et al. (2006) Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) Investigators. Renal function as a predictor of outcome in a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure. Circulation 113: 671-678. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y9e4vm6l
  50. van Kimmenade RR, Januzzi JL Jr, Baggish AL, Lainchbury JG, Bayes-Genis A, et al. (2006) Amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic Peptide, renal function, and outcomes in acute heart failure: redefining the cardiorenal interaction? J Am Coll Cardiol. 48: 1621-1627. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ydb4ed3h
  51. Taal M, Chertow G, Marsden P, Skorecki K, Yu A, Brenner B (2011) RA system. Brenner & Rector’s the Kidney. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier 94-137. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y83r7znl
  52. Packer M (1987) Adaptive and maladaptive actions of angiotensin II in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 10: 66-73. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ydx6msrb
  53. Suki WN (1989) Renal hemodynamic consequences of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med 149: 669-673. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y748gm2g
  54. Badr KF, Ichikawa I (1988) Prerenal failure: a deleterious shift from renal compensation to decompensation. N Engl J Med 319: 623-629. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ydx6msrb
  55. Hillege HL, van Gilst WH, van Veldhuisen DJ, Navis G, Grobbee DE, et al. [2003] de Graeff PA, de Zeeuw D; CATS Randomized Trial. Accelerated decline and prognostic impact of renal function after myocardial infarction and the benefits of ACE inhibition: the CATS randomized trial. Eur Heart J 24: 412-420. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y9tqpgyy
  56. Bakris GL, Weir MR (2000) Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated elevations in serum creatinine: is this a cause for concern? Arch Intern Med 160: 685-693. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yb4qj2wd
  57. Holtkamp FA, de Zeeuw D, Thomas MC, Cooper ME, de Graeff PA, et al. (2011) An acute fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate during treatment with losartan predicts a slower decrease in long-term renal function. Kidney Int 80: 282-287. Link: https://tinyurl.com/yaeprojk
  58. Ambrosy A, Goldsmith SR, Gheorghiade M (2011) Tolvaptan for the treatment of heart failure: a review of the literature. Expert Opin Pharmacother 12: 961-976. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ycsz25fr
  59. Costello-Boerrigter LC, Smith WB, Boerrigter G, Ouyang J, Zimmer CA, et al. (2006) Vasopressin-2-receptor antagonism augments water excretion without changes in renal hemodynamics or sodium and potassium excretion in human heart failure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: 273-278. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ya4tzwwe
  60. Felker GM, Mentz RJ, Cole RT, Adams KF, Egnaczyk GF, et al. (2017) Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 69: 1399-1406. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ycqngf78
  61. Konstam MA, Kiernan M, Chandler A, Dhingra R, Mody FV, et al. (2017) SECRET of CHF Investigators, Coordinators, and Committee Members. Short-Term Effects of Tolvaptan in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Volume Overload. J Am Coll Cardiol 69: 1409-1419. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ydggytwx
  62. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC Jr, Grinfeld L, Maggioni AP, et al. (2007) Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) Investigators. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA 297: 1319-1331. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y8ybmyn9
  63. Matsue Y, Suzuki M, Torii S, Yamaguchi S, Fukamizu S, et al. (2016) Clinical Effectiveness of Tolvaptan in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Renal Dysfunction. J Card Fail 22: 423-432. Link: https://tinyurl.com/y6wh7e2t
  64. Starling RC, Young JB (2017) Tolvaptan in Acute Heart Failure: Time to Move On. J Am Coll Cardiol 69: 1407-1408. Link: https://tinyurl.com/ybc3kq2y
© 2018 Ohno M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
 

Order for reprints


Print Friendly and PDF

Article Alerts

Subscribe to our articles alerts and stay tuned.


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.