International Open-Access, Peer-reviewed platform

Our vision is to provide a global platform for open journals to promote qualitative research publications for
Science, Engineering, Technology and Medicine, with an un-restricted access.

Reviewer Guidelines

What is peer review?

Peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief or the editorial board) deciding whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish; and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. .

Reviewers play a key role in Open Access publishing work. Peer Review system is an essential procedure for quality of research, scientific justification and publication. Peertechz Open Access Journals welcomes scientists, researchers, academicians and scholars interested in serving as volunteer reviewer is any researcher with minimum educational qualification is to be PhD.

Following guidelines to review the articles:
  1. Reviewers should not reveal his/her information at any stage
  2. Reviewer should not show any favoritism or partiality while reviewing the manuscript
  3. Reviewers should present the receiving letter once it is assigned
  4. Should review the manuscript within provided timeline
  5. Determining scientific merit, originality, and scope of the work; indicating ways to improve it; and recommending acceptance or rejection using whatever rating scale the editor deems most useful
  6. If the manuscript does not meet the criteria of the journal or not up to the quality, then the reviewer has to directly inform to the editor
  7. If any difficulty in the content of manuscript, figures they can frankly drop a line to editor or editorial office
  8. Articles are assigned based on the research interests of the reviewer. If in case, if the manuscript is beyond the knowledge of reviewer, can approach the assigned editor or editorial office
  9. Reviewer consistently improves the journal standards by handling meticulous peer review
  10. Reviewer should provide guidelines to authors for making revised version according to peer review comments
  11. Editor can easily take the decision based on the reviewers detailed and constructive comments that will be helpful to the authors to their progressive manuscript
  12. Review comments are considered for obtaining well prepared manuscripts, where as in any case editor decision remains final


Timeline for manuscript processing
  1. They have to assign the reviewers or if the editor busy with other commitments, he can assign editorial duties to Editorial Office at the same time
  2. To reviewers, the timeline for peer review process is 7 to 10 days depend upon reviewer request for extending the date to submit his/her review
  3. The timeline to author regarding revision of the manuscript is 5 to 10 days based on the decision of editor such as major revision, minor revision and re-review
  4. Editor should be given his precious decision for publication/rejection of the manuscript within 24 to 48 hours after getting the revised version
  5. Publishing Group should provide final research work on online within three business working days from the accepted date.
Benefits for Reviewers
  • If the reviewer complete the review process in minimum 10 articles within provided timeline per year, then they will get some discounts on their submission
  • If any reviewer brings the institutional/university membership to editorial office, he can get waiver on the publication of their manuscript
  • If they really work on getting the articles that means reviewer can suggest their colleagues for submitting the manuscript to us, respective reviewer get complete waiver on his/her submission
  • On editorial/research/review article, reviewer can get complete waiver (publish article with free of cost)

If you want to associate as a reviewer in respective field in our organization, kindly contact us along with CV, research interest at email: We will get back to you in one business working day.